Media blasting is a term that’s been coined in the very recent past. Prior to the 1990s, the process of blasting with abrasive media was more commonly (and more correctly) called sand blasting. Back in the early days of blasting, the predominant abrasive of choice was sand. Silica sand is the more appropriate name – based on the fact that common sand is primarily comprised of mineral quartz, which itself is composed of silica, and oxygen. Silica sand was used because it’s cheap, readily available, and effective for many applications. These were simpler times when cost and results were given more weight than the health and safety of those exposed to it. Seatbelts, for instance, weren’t required in cars and trucks. Cigarettes weren’t considered dangerous. And I still don’t remember wearing a helmet while riding a bicycle until well into adulthood – simpler times indeed.
We now know that breathing silica dust is extremely dangerous. Silica sandblasting has long been closely associated with the disease historically referred to as miner’s phthisis, potter’s rot, or grinder’s asthma. Breathing “dust” in mining and other dust-producing activities has been associated with lung disease since ancient Greek and Roman times. More recently, with the industrial age, came inventions such as the pneumatic drill and jackhammer for boring into rock, (circa 1897), and sand blasting for finishing hard surfaces like iron and steel (circa 1904). These innovations produced large amounts of silica dust with little care, or understanding, for the health concerns they created. More accurately called silicosis, this deadly disease is caused by the inhalation of crystalline silica.
In more recent times, the EPA has identified crystalline silica as a human lung carcinogen – an agent that causes cancer. OSHA, and other regulatory agencies, target businesses that expose employees to large amounts of silica-laden dust. In particular, these agencies identify contractors and industries that knowingly increase this exposure with silica dust-creating processes – like blasting with sand.
With the recognition that silica sand is hazardous, and that sand blasting can expose operators to massive amounts of silica dust, alternative blast media choices were required. This began the shift from sand blasting to media blasting. Some of this shift simply required a substitution of another medium for the sand, some required a bit more work. The remainder of this article will look at some of the more popular alternatives – their characteristics, their advantages and disadvantages, and their common applications.
Let’s start this discussion with one of the earliest of the silica-free alternatives – coal slag. Coal slag was one of the first alternatives to hit the market. Cheap, silica-free, and effective, this material became very popular as a blast abrasive. Coal slag is a byproduct of the blast furnaces found in steel production, and their associated use of coal. Huge piles of this black, glassy, leftover material (slag) are crushed and screened for use in any number of applications including abrasive blasting. Besides its black, dusty residue, coal slag has another dark side. As the name implies, slag is made up of the “stuff ” that’s left after the coal is burned. Inevitably, this includes impurities such as beryllium and arsenic, as well as other heavy metals such as Lead, Vanadium, and Titanium. According to one industry paper from 2020, “OSHA has stated repeatedly that coal slag contains beryllium which exceeds the PEL (permissible exposure limits), and OSHA offers data to back it up.” With the U.S. Dept. of Labor issuing its so-called Beryllium Rule in 2020 – and the resulting new OSHA fact sheet regarding Beryllium exposure – coal slag was mentioned 10 times specifically, while no other media were even mentioned. This same paper goes on to state “…the (US Dept. of Labor) Rule does acknowledge there are safer abrasives employers can select than coal slag.” To be clear, coal slag is a target of OSHA; those who chose to use it are inviting the ire of this organization, as well as huge future liabilities for laborers affected by a material known to be hazardous to human health. Let’s move away from slag products and shift our focus to some of those safer abrasives.
When considering abrasives, there are four very important physical characteristics that help to understand their use and application; 1) hardness, 2) shape, 3) friability, and 4) density. The first of these, hardness, is easily understood. We’re talking about mineral hardness. In this case, imagine the diamond scratching glass example that we’ve all seen demonstrated in one way or another. The diamond is minerally harder than the glass, when the edge of the diamond is scraped across the glass, it scratches. The explanation – diamond is harder than glass. When used as blast abrasives, harder materials are generally more “aggressive” than softer material.
Harder media like Aluminum Oxide, Garnet, and Magnesium Oxide are quite aggressive blast media. Softer media like baking soda and corn cob are gentler and non-damaging. The shape of the abrasive particles has a big impact on their interaction with the blasted surface. Particles that under a microscope have a sharp, knife-like structure will cut at a surface. The original blast medium – silica sand – and newer media such as crushed glass have particles that are angular and thus more aggressive to coatings and substrates than dull or rounded particles. Particles of media that exhibit a round shape – such as glass bead – will peen a surface like a hammer blow rather than cutting or scratching. Other particles, described as “blocky” are more squared-off in shape with an effect that is somewhere in between these other two.
Consider plastic and walnut shell blast media for instance. Their moderate aggression towards coatings is a benefit, but damage to various substrates like brick and mortar is limited. When considering blast abrasives, friability could be defined as a material’s likeliness to fracture, or break apart, upon impact with a hard surface. Blast media particles that break apart disperse the energy of the impact and are generally less aggressive. As an example, imagine the “crumple zones” in modern cars and trucks that absorb the impact of a crash to minimize the damage to the occupants. For instance, all very-friable blast media – such as baking soda and dry ice – tend to fall into the “non-damaging” category. Lastly, let’s consider the density (weight per cubic foot) of a blast abrasive – what many would call the “heaviness”. Blast media with higher densities are generally more aggressive. Ever heard the phrase “it hit me like a ton of lead”? Heavy blast media carry that impact energy farther and hit with more intensity than lighter particles. Understanding an abrasive’s hardness, shape, friability, and density goes a long way toward understanding its effectiveness in different applications.
Let’s examine some of today’s more popular blast media choices with these characteristics in mind as well as their effect on different applications. When you shift away from sand as a do-it-all blast medium, most people attempt to replace this dirt-cheap blast abrasive with something that offers increased value for the increase in cost. In other words, if you’re going to pay more for something, you look for a better, quicker, or more efficient medium for the additional money.
Let’s start with one of the softest, most friable of all the media – baking soda. These abrasive blast particles have a knife-like shape that strips everything from light paint to heavy soot with relative ease. The density of baking soda is light, so much of it’s power comes from aggressive shape. The fact that baking soda abrasive is so non-damaging to substrates is due to its softness, and its friability. This blast abrasive pays back its higher price by offering several distinct benefits. It’s non-destructive to most materials including wood framing, and other building materials. Again, it’s friable and soft so it has virtually no impact on surfaces like steel, and glass. Here’s the real hidden benefit when blasted, the chemical side of baking soda also neutralizes odors from smoke and fire as well as mold, sewage, guano, skunks, drugs, and other smelly contaminants. This effect is multiplied by the friability factor – when media particles break easily, they create dust. Often wrongly seen as a negative, baking soda dust in contact with odor sources, means more effective odor reduction.
Dry ice is one of the most misunderstood blast media, but it can be examined in a similar fashion. Dry ice is solid carbon dioxide. As such it is “minerally soft”, and non-damaging to most hard surfaces like stainless steel, and other metals. The shape of most dry ice particles is rather “blocky” due to the particles being comprised of 1.5 mm diameter pellets. So, while not overly dense, it can still be somewhat aggressive against many coatings, and layers of debris. Blasting of industrial equipment and production lines are prime examples of where dry ice really shines is in the area of friability. Upon striking a hard surface, dry ice is smashed into such tiny pieces that the increased surface area of those particles can no longer remain solid at room temperature. They immediately sublimate (turning from a solid to a gas with no liquid state) and “disappear” into the surrounding atmosphere. Most often, this is highly advantageous, with the blasting process leaving no secondary waste – no spent medium. This leaves only primary waste – the dirt or coating – to be cleaned up and disposed of. One interesting note with dry ice is its extremely cold temperature when solid: -109°F below zero. This is both a positive and a negative when using this blast medium.
Positive because it seemingly disappears upon blasting. Negative because is means that dry ice requires specialized blasting equipment. To avoid an explosion, no standard blasting pots or pressure vessels and no sealed containers allowed! Further, since dry ice sublimates into large quantities of CO2 gas, it should only be used in well-ventilated spaces to avoid the dangers of oxygen deprivation.
Walnut shell – and it’s agricultural cousin corn cob meal – are two of the more popular and affordable media classified as “blocky”. These two blast media are very similar in nature. Corn cob meal – the hard inner portion of the corncob – and walnut shell are both byproducts of their respective primary produce. As such, they’re inexpensive and generally available, with some variation due to seasonal and harvest outcomes. Their lack of friability might lead you to expect that they’re very aggressive against substrates. This is not entirely true, however, due to their very low density and mineral “softness” they remain nearly non-damaging. In fact, this lack of friability is one of the distinct advantages to these media – low dust levels from blasting. Their low cost, ability to effectively strip coatings, and their safe nature make them prime candidates for many large blasting jobs such as log cabins and warehouse fires that require quantities of one-pass blasting media. Please note that walnut shells are a tree nut. Operators should be screened for tree nut allergies before any exposure to walnut shells. When necessary, use corn cob meal as your primary choice and avoid the risk of an allergic reaction, which in some cases may be severe.
Moving on to harder, more aggressive media we come to glass media. Crushed glass and glass beads are both moderately dense and moderately hard. These media are truly best characterized by their shape.
First, let’s confront the fact that glass is primarily made from silica sand! This is where an understanding of organic chemistry (science) and physical properties of matter (engineering) would be helpful. We’ll just agree that while glass is made from silica, it’s not silica anymore. The basic mineral quartz has undergone a phase change and is no longer the crystalline structure that causes respiratory diseases like silicosis. Adequate safety measures (respirators, ventilation, gloves, etc…) should still be taken, but the basic premise is that you’re protecting yourself from particulate that is a nuisance, not a killer. Crushed glass is sourced from recycled bottle glass and is readily available – thus a very inexpensive option as a blast abrasive. Crushed glass is angular in shape, and thus aggressive against coatings, and profiles (roughens) hard surfaces – beneficial when painting or powder-coating is necessary. Due to its low cost and ready availability, crushed glass is very popular when used in processes that only allow for one pass of the media through the system like wet abrasive blasting. Glass beads, on the other hand, are created by melting glass cullet, and spraying the molten glass and collecting the resulting droplets, or beads. This is a relatively expensive process, and glass beads are usually three to four times more expensive than crushed glass. Invaluable for applying a smooth, matte finish to stainless steel and aluminum, glass bead is a natural choice due primarily to it’s round shape.
On the most aggressive end of the abrasive spectrum are blast media that are characterized by a sharp shape (knife-like), high-hardness (some comparable to diamond), high-density (heavy), and low friability (resistance to fracturing). Materials like calcined aluminum oxide, the mined mineral garnet, and created materials like synthetic olivine are prime examples of the high levels of aggressiveness that blasting can provide. Removing paint and rust from metal, as well as providing anchor patterns (roughness) for coatings, and exposing aggregate on prefabricated concrete panels are excellent applications for these most aggressive blast media. Depending on the material, some – like garnet and mag oxide – are inexpensive enough to be appropriate for one-pass applications where collecting and reusing them is problematic (wet blasting for instance). Others are too expensive – like aluminum oxide – for one-pass applications and call for recycling and reuse to be cost-effective (blast room applications for instance.) by providing many passes due to low levels of friability. These aggressive media are also known for their density. Heavier media carry energy farther than lighter media. The result of heavier density means larger blast patterns and more effective coating removal.
I hope you’ve enjoyed this brief examination of blast media based on their physical characteristics and their associated applications. This is a topic that comes up every day in my world. Hopefully this will be helpful to you, and your blasting operations. If you still have questions or wish to discuss a unique situation not covered here, please reach out to brighten my day with your questions. I’m always in the mood to discuss something abrasive.